Home

Schiedsrichter Betäuben Feier shoe branding europe bvba v adidas and ohim Wolke Vorderseite Berühmtheit

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion  Industry
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry

CURIA - Documents
CURIA - Documents

K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks  and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15
K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual  property | The Guardian
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian

The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion  Industry
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 24/18 adidas may  oppose the registration, as an EU trade mark, of two paral
General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 24/18 adidas may oppose the registration, as an EU trade mark, of two paral

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG

adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel  stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes

6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&
6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&

Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand

Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA  against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh

Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the  Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR  Developments
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments

Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe  Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog
Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel  Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness  – SCRIPTed
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

CURIA - Documents
CURIA - Documents

TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.:  303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA
TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.: 303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law

CURIA - Documentos
CURIA - Documentos

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe  Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv

Welcome
Welcome